Is a Mosin Nagant a good first gun to buy?

Question

i was looking to purchase a cheap gun that i could just take to my house in the mountains to target shoot. I`ve shot 22Lr`s for about 4-5 years now and that`s pretty much it nothing higher caliber. I was just wondering if i should go with the Nagant or something else. If i shouldn`t get a Nagant what gun should i go with ( i`m not trying to spend a lot of money. ) Please Help.

Answer 1

If you're looking for a cheap to buy and cheap to shoot full power centerfire rifle then the Mosin isn't a bad choice. They are solid dependable rifles, though designed for a Russian soldier in winter gear so relatively short stocked and with a metal butt plate. First thing I always recommend to a new Mosin owner is a slip on recoil pad. Your shoulder with thank you.

Buy a case of the cheap surplus ammo that's readily available, but be sure to pick up a cleaning kit too *** the cheap stuff is corrosive so you must clean the weapon after every firing.

The gun is accurate enough that they were used by snipers in WWII, but cannot hold a candle to modern bolt action target guns made today. Those will set you back five or ten times what you pay for the Nagant with ammo much more expensive as well.

For plinking and casual target shooting I'd stay with the .22LR, but if you want more boom and punch the Mosin Nagant will do you right.

Answer 2

The Mosin-Nagant ninety one/30 is a Soviet-era bolt-action. Like maximum Soviet-era designs, its good and strong below even the worst situations (IE getting used via an illiterate Russian peasant who can particularly keep in mind a thank you to scrub the gun interior the direction of the Russian/Siberian wintry climate). Assuming the top-spacing is real and the barrel's no longer rusted out, the gun could be risk-free. That mentioned the bolt does not perform almost as soft as a 1903 Springfield, Lee-Enfield, or Mauser ninety 8. and that they kick like a mule. finally the iron factors of interest go away somewhat to be needed. They paintings, yet they're crude and not conducive to great accuracy. on the full they don't seem to be a great gun, yet they paintings and that's quite all that needs to be mentioned for them. Frankly an even bigger concern than the gun is the ammunition. lots of the cheap 7.62x54R ammunition is corrosively primed. which ability it must be wiped clean at contemporary once you're completed taking pictures and you ought to use water (or another substance which will dissolve the pottassium chlorate salts deposited interior the barrel via the primer) and then as quickly as you have completed that, you could clean the gun using the traditional solvents and cleaners that get rid of powder, lead, and copper fouling. in case you do no longer do this, it particularly is going to rust the barrel. In a remarkably brief time. to sidestep this pointless headache, i might inspire you to make advantageous your boyfriend buys non-corrosively primed (advertisement) ammunition. As for the fee... $one hundred eighty is particularly extreme for a Mosin-Nagant ninety one/30. commonly they retail for $seventy 5-$a hundred and fifty (counting on the uncomplicated and the presence or absence of upload-ons). For $one hundred eighty, i might wish you're getting the sniper version with a three.5x PU scope. or you're getting ripped off.

Answer 3

The rifle is well designed and very safe in all respects; 762x54R is a rimmed shell close to 30-06 and will be good for hunting anything in the lower 48. There are about 17 million of them manufactured so the price is reasonable and etc to the nTH degree. BING the Mosin for a brief and interesting history; Westinghouse Electric and Remington even manufactured them; the US Army even had some of them produced in 30-06 caliber due to wartime shortages; they are know as the ultimate soldier's rifle. One minor thing that I found about them is the stock is in the usual military mindset of "one size fits all" and a tad short; just get a Limbsaver slip on recoil reducing pad or a Pachemeyer slip on; the extra length makes it very comfortable to shoot and the metal buttplate will not skitter out from under it when you set it down. Problem solved.

Answer 4

If you want an inexpensive centerfire rifle that's cheap to shoot and you don't care about using it for hunting or precision target shooting, then not a bad choice at all. I, like several other people here, have both an M44 and 91/30. Picked up both guns with 440 rounds of ammo for $400 delivered. That'll hardly buy you a decent used Remington 700.

Answer 5

the 91/30 is the cheapest out there, j&g sales has it listed for something like $70, i would pay the extra $10 on there to get a good bore, plus shipping, and the FFL dealer transfer fee. all in all, ~$130 for a rifle with the ballistic equivalent of a 30-06, and bulk ammo that costs less than 30 cents a round

Answer 6

if you've shot .22LR before, then it's not going to be your first gun right? I think the mosin nagant is a reasonable choice, but you should get someone to help you learn to shoot larger guns like these, you don't want to develop shooter's flinch or injure yourself with improper handling and shooting, it's for the best.

Answer 7

Try a .30 carbine. Available used and new. Parts everyplace, Lighter & handier. Not a kicker. A semi auto over a bolt gun.

Answer 8

You will have people tell you that its a cheap piece of junk but I have two, a m44 and a 91/30 and I love them. They are simple and cheap to shoot.

Answer 9

I think that is a great Idea! They are accurate and powerful, though you probebly should start with a remington 700!

Answer 10

I wouldn't buy one at all. But it can be a good first gun, so the answer would basically be "yes".

Answer 11

i own both a m44 carbine and a m91/30 and i love them both. make sure to clean them well.