http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clip_(ammunition)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magazine_(firearms)
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/01/24/dont-call-a-magazine-a-clip-we-spoke-with-an-ex-seal-about-the-difference-and-why-its-important/
http://www.minutemanreview.com/2008/09/clip-vs-magazine-lesson-in-firearm.html
http://www.gunsandammo.com/2012/03/07/whats-in-a-name-common-gun-term-mistakes/
http://dailycaller.com/2013/05/31/bullshooters-clip-or-magazine/
http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/21/clip-vs-magazine/
Look, here in the hunting section we do all know the difference between a "clip" and a "magazine," for the most part. And generally, if someone is obviously lacking knowledge, we will correct them. Not criticize them- correct them.
However, we sometimes encounter those people who insist on calling a magazine a "clip," a cartridge a "bullet," a semi-automatic sporting rifle an "assault weapon," etc. And some of these people do not care what is correct, especially those whose purpose is to ban firearms.
We get it. We really, really, get it. Some people are just ignorant. That's no insult- ignorance is simply the state of not knowing, and when it's obvious that someone is ignorant, we do attempt to correct their ignorance. But then there's willful ignorance. That's just stupid.
Is it okay to call a Ford Focus a truck? Is it okay to call a head of lettuce a fruit? Is it okay to call an internet troll an upstanding member of the community?
The point of Yahoo Answers, according to the many people who come here and tell us how to answer their questions, is to educate. So we attempt to educate. Sometimes it gets a little ridiculous, though. Sometimes it gets frustrating.
The amazing part is that we have so much information at our fingertips due to these incredible devices we carry on our hips and in our pockets, but people cannot take the time to spend a moment researching to make sure they actually have a basic knowledge of the subject matter about which they're inquiring.
If one of us were to approach a neurosurgeon to ask them something about their occupation, wouldn't it seem logical that we would know at least enough terminology to ask in a coherent manner? "Hey doc, I hear you do surgery on people's stomachs since you're a neurosurgeon, right?"
As for why Remington chose a technically incorrect term, I don't know. I'll never really knock someone who is ignorant for using the wrong term, but frankly, Remington should have used the correct term. In the end, it's pedantic to castigate someone for improper terminology, unless they should have known better. And Remington should have known better.
Yes, yes, slang often becomes accepted language... but given how much of an attack gun ownership is under around the globe, educating people as to WHY the gun grabbers are wrong- even in such minor things as terminology- is a good start in defeating their agenda.
I'll leave you with this thought: if a gun grabber doesn't even know what that thingy that holds too many "bullets" is, how could they be a reliable authority on whether or not it should be banned? Think about it...